<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (8) TMI 99 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43148</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the impugned order under Sec. 35F of the Central Excises and Salt Act 1944, directing a fresh consideration of the petitioner&#039;s application for refund. Emphasizing the importance of considering refundable amounts before demanding payment of duty, the Court highlighted the need for a proper application of mind by the authorities and protection of the assessee&#039;s interests in accordance with legal precedents. The 1st respondent was instructed to reevaluate the application within four weeks, taking into account the petitioner&#039;s undertaking not to withdraw the refund amount until the appeal&#039;s disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:32:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (8) TMI 99 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43148</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the impugned order under Sec. 35F of the Central Excises and Salt Act 1944, directing a fresh consideration of the petitioner&#039;s application for refund. Emphasizing the importance of considering refundable amounts before demanding payment of duty, the Court highlighted the need for a proper application of mind by the authorities and protection of the assessee&#039;s interests in accordance with legal precedents. The 1st respondent was instructed to reevaluate the application within four weeks, taking into account the petitioner&#039;s undertaking not to withdraw the refund amount until the appeal&#039;s disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>