<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 1370 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461724</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the writ petition challenging tax reassessment, finding procedural non-compliance with amended Income Tax Act provisions. The court quashed the assessment orders due to jurisdictional defects in reopening proceedings, specifically the failure to follow faceless assessment mechanisms introduced from 01.04.2021. The Revenue&#039;s right to initiate fresh proceedings under amended provisions was explicitly preserved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 11:36:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=816736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 1370 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461724</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the writ petition challenging tax reassessment, finding procedural non-compliance with amended Income Tax Act provisions. The court quashed the assessment orders due to jurisdictional defects in reopening proceedings, specifically the failure to follow faceless assessment mechanisms introduced from 01.04.2021. The Revenue&#039;s right to initiate fresh proceedings under amended provisions was explicitly preserved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>