<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (9) TMI 82 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43139</link>
    <description>A retracted statement recorded under section 108 of the Customs Act could not, by itself, justify reversal of an acquittal. The court accepted that the acquittal was a considered order and found no reliable independent corroboration linking the respondent to the alleged offence. The Customs officer&#039;s evidence did not add sufficient weight to displace the acquittal, so the prosecution failed to establish grounds for interference. The acquittal was therefore upheld and the respondent remained acquitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:10:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (9) TMI 82 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43139</link>
      <description>A retracted statement recorded under section 108 of the Customs Act could not, by itself, justify reversal of an acquittal. The court accepted that the acquittal was a considered order and found no reliable independent corroboration linking the respondent to the alleged offence. The Customs officer&#039;s evidence did not add sufficient weight to displace the acquittal, so the prosecution failed to establish grounds for interference. The acquittal was therefore upheld and the respondent remained acquitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>