<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (10) TMI 50 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43138</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the respondent to refund Rs. 75,000 within four weeks. The court emphasized that without formal assessment and demand, the collection of advance excise duty was unauthorized. Additionally, the petitioner was directed to cooperate in the adjudication proceedings to facilitate a fair resolution of excise duty issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:08:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (10) TMI 50 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43138</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the respondent to refund Rs. 75,000 within four weeks. The court emphasized that without formal assessment and demand, the collection of advance excise duty was unauthorized. Additionally, the petitioner was directed to cooperate in the adjudication proceedings to facilitate a fair resolution of excise duty issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>