<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (10) TMI 49 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43137</link>
    <description>Interest on refunded excise duty was held payable only from the date of the writ court&#039;s refund order, not from the date of the belated refund application. The refund claim was time-barred and could be granted only under Article 226, so the earlier application date could not determine the start of interest. The court modified the interest direction accordingly and limited the liability to the period after the refund order, in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:04:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (10) TMI 49 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43137</link>
      <description>Interest on refunded excise duty was held payable only from the date of the writ court&#039;s refund order, not from the date of the belated refund application. The refund claim was time-barred and could be granted only under Article 226, so the earlier application date could not determine the start of interest. The court modified the interest direction accordingly and limited the liability to the period after the refund order, in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>