https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43131 The petitioners were found entitled to refund of excess interest collected for the relevant period, as the respondents conceded the refund claim in their common counter-affidavit. The Court directed the refund applications to be processed, the payable amount to be computed, and payment to be made within eight weeks. It also held that limitation could not be raised as a defence because the writ petitions had remained pending since 31-3-1989, and that pendency operated to the petitioners' benefit. The plea of limitation was therefore rejected. en-us Fri, 08 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:44:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43131 The petitioners were found entitled to refund of excess interest collected for the relevant period, as the respondents conceded the refund claim in their common counter-affidavit. The Court directed the refund applications to be processed, the payable amount to be computed, and payment to be made within eight weeks. It also held that limitation could not be raised as a defence because the writ petitions had remained pending since 31-3-1989, and that pendency operated to the petitioners' benefit. The plea of limitation was therefore rejected. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 08 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43131