https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769265 Dealing in Buprenorphine Hydrochloride may fall within Section 8(c) of the NDPS Act because the Act's prohibition applies to psychotropic substances listed in its Schedule, and the NDPS Rules cannot narrow that substantive restraint; the rules operate cumulatively with other applicable regulatory regimes. The text also states that the interpretation in Sanjeev V. Deshpande is retrospective, since judicial clarification ordinarily declares what the law has always meant, and no basis for prospective overruling was identified. It further explains that Section 216 CrPC permits alteration or addition of a charge before judgment, but does not allow deletion of a charge or discharge after charges have been framed. en-us Thu, 17 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Apr 2025 09:09:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769265 Dealing in Buprenorphine Hydrochloride may fall within Section 8(c) of the NDPS Act because the Act's prohibition applies to psychotropic substances listed in its Schedule, and the NDPS Rules cannot narrow that substantive restraint; the rules operate cumulatively with other applicable regulatory regimes. The text also states that the interpretation in Sanjeev V. Deshpande is retrospective, since judicial clarification ordinarily declares what the law has always meant, and no basis for prospective overruling was identified. It further explains that Section 216 CrPC permits alteration or addition of a charge before judgment, but does not allow deletion of a charge or discharge after charges have been framed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769265