https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43127 The court upheld the Superintendent of Central Excise's decision to restrict the rebate claim to Rs. 4,31,618.75 for a Co-operative Sugar Mills. The court found the reasons provided by the Superintendent to be legally valid, dismissing the writ petition without costs. The dispute regarding representation as an appeal and the challenge against the order of the Superintendent were addressed, emphasizing the correct interpretation of the notification granting rebate and criticizing the petitioners for not seeking timely legal advice. en-us Tue, 19 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:26:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43127 The court upheld the Superintendent of Central Excise's decision to restrict the rebate claim to Rs. 4,31,618.75 for a Co-operative Sugar Mills. The court found the reasons provided by the Superintendent to be legally valid, dismissing the writ petition without costs. The dispute regarding representation as an appeal and the challenge against the order of the Superintendent were addressed, emphasizing the correct interpretation of the notification granting rebate and criticizing the petitioners for not seeking timely legal advice. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43127