<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1239 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769325</link>
    <description>HC analyzed a GST tax credit dispute involving a Rs. 7,88,611/- demand against a taxpayer. Despite procedural limitations, the court exercised discretionary power to permit the taxpayer to file an appeal within 30 days, ensuring the case would be adjudicated on merits. The ruling balanced statutory requirements with principles of natural justice, allowing the petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demand despite missed original limitation periods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 14:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=816514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1239 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769325</link>
      <description>HC analyzed a GST tax credit dispute involving a Rs. 7,88,611/- demand against a taxpayer. Despite procedural limitations, the court exercised discretionary power to permit the taxpayer to file an appeal within 30 days, ensuring the case would be adjudicated on merits. The ruling balanced statutory requirements with principles of natural justice, allowing the petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demand despite missed original limitation periods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>