<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1171 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769257</link>
    <description>The ITAT addressed reassessment challenges in tax proceedings, focusing on two key issues involving alleged bogus purchases. The Tribunal held that reopening assessments cannot constitute a change of opinion, restricting additions to 8% gross profit on purchases from two enterprises. The court deleted the entire reassessment addition for one enterprise and confirmed a limited gross profit addition for the other, emphasizing procedural constraints in tax reassessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 09:07:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=816507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1171 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769257</link>
      <description>The ITAT addressed reassessment challenges in tax proceedings, focusing on two key issues involving alleged bogus purchases. The Tribunal held that reopening assessments cannot constitute a change of opinion, restricting additions to 8% gross profit on purchases from two enterprises. The court deleted the entire reassessment addition for one enterprise and confirmed a limited gross profit addition for the other, emphasizing procedural constraints in tax reassessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>