https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461708 Appellate court resolved a central excise dispute regarding palm stearin classification. The court upheld the appellant's classification under Tariff Item No. 15119090, finding the classification bona fide based on prevailing CBEC circulars and Tribunal decisions. The court rejected revenue's allegations of misclassification, set aside duty demands, penalties, and confiscation orders, and ruled that the extended limitation period was improperly invoked due to lack of evidence of intentional duty evasion. en-us Fri, 27 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Apr 2025 20:38:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461708 Appellate court resolved a central excise dispute regarding palm stearin classification. The court upheld the appellant's classification under Tariff Item No. 15119090, finding the classification bona fide based on prevailing CBEC circulars and Tribunal decisions. The court rejected revenue's allegations of misclassification, set aside duty demands, penalties, and confiscation orders, and ruled that the extended limitation period was improperly invoked due to lack of evidence of intentional duty evasion. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 27 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461708