<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 2016 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461688</link>
    <description>Criminal proceedings should not be quashed in inherent jurisdiction where the complaint alleges inducement to part with property consideration under an agreement to sell, and the truth of the allegations cannot be conclusively assessed without trial. Because investigation was complete, chargesheet filed, charges framed, and prosecution evidence had begun, the High Court ought not to have treated the dispute as purely civil at the quashing stage. The order quashing the FIR and criminal case was therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 19:03:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=816461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 2016 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461688</link>
      <description>Criminal proceedings should not be quashed in inherent jurisdiction where the complaint alleges inducement to part with property consideration under an agreement to sell, and the truth of the allegations cannot be conclusively assessed without trial. Because investigation was complete, chargesheet filed, charges framed, and prosecution evidence had begun, the High Court ought not to have treated the dispute as purely civil at the quashing stage. The order quashing the FIR and criminal case was therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>