<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 2016 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461688</link>
    <description>The SC reversed the HC&#039;s order quashing criminal proceedings against the accused. The Court held that allegations of property sale without title and inducing payment prima facie disclose potential criminal offences under IPC Sections 406, 420, and related provisions. The matter must proceed to trial to determine criminal intent, as the HC prematurely quashed proceedings after chargesheet and charge framing under Section 482 CrPC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 19:03:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=816461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 2016 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461688</link>
      <description>The SC reversed the HC&#039;s order quashing criminal proceedings against the accused. The Court held that allegations of property sale without title and inducing payment prima facie disclose potential criminal offences under IPC Sections 406, 420, and related provisions. The matter must proceed to trial to determine criminal intent, as the HC prematurely quashed proceedings after chargesheet and charge framing under Section 482 CrPC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>