<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (10) TMI 44 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE.AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43112</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the orders confirming the confiscation of imported goods under the Customs Act. The petitioner successfully challenged the legality of the orders, resulting in the release of the goods upon furnishing a bank guarantee and escorting them to a bonded warehouse under Customs Officers&#039; supervision. The Court clarified that the decision did not establish the imported goods as raw material and discharged the bank guarantee without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:51:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (10) TMI 44 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE.AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43112</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the orders confirming the confiscation of imported goods under the Customs Act. The petitioner successfully challenged the legality of the orders, resulting in the release of the goods upon furnishing a bank guarantee and escorting them to a bonded warehouse under Customs Officers&#039; supervision. The Court clarified that the decision did not establish the imported goods as raw material and discharged the bank guarantee without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>