<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (9) TMI 78 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43107</link>
    <description>Interest on refunded excise duty was upheld as payable at 18% per annum, but the running of interest was confined to the date of the Tribunal&#039;s order because the entitlement to refund arose only from that order. The earlier period was rejected as the basis for interest. Accordingly, interest was payable on the refunded principal amount only from 20-9-1990 to 27-8-1991.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:31:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (9) TMI 78 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43107</link>
      <description>Interest on refunded excise duty was upheld as payable at 18% per annum, but the running of interest was confined to the date of the Tribunal&#039;s order because the entitlement to refund arose only from that order. The earlier period was rejected as the basis for interest. Accordingly, interest was payable on the refunded principal amount only from 20-9-1990 to 27-8-1991.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>