<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1369 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461680</link>
    <description>Unregistered lease deeds for a term exceeding one year could not be used to enforce the contractual tenancy period or three-month notice clause, so the tenancy was treated as month-to-month and terminable under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act. Notice sent by registered post and courier to the suit premises and registered office attracted the statutory presumption of service, which was not rebutted, so termination was validly served. Once the tenancy ended, the plaintiffs were entitled to possession and proved arrears of rent, while mesne profits were assessed at the last admitted contractual rent rather than the higher claimed market rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 11:15:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=816335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1369 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461680</link>
      <description>Unregistered lease deeds for a term exceeding one year could not be used to enforce the contractual tenancy period or three-month notice clause, so the tenancy was treated as month-to-month and terminable under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act. Notice sent by registered post and courier to the suit premises and registered office attracted the statutory presumption of service, which was not rebutted, so termination was validly served. Once the tenancy ended, the plaintiffs were entitled to possession and proved arrears of rent, while mesne profits were assessed at the last admitted contractual rent rather than the higher claimed market rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>