https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769188 A belated request for forensic examination of disputed cheque signatures, made after the matter had reached final arguments, was refused because the signature dispute was apparent from the dishonour memo from the outset and the accused had already entered appearance without leading defence evidence. The court treated the application as an attempt to introduce evidence indirectly and to fill gaps in the defence case without satisfactory justification. The rejection of the request for recall of the cheques and related documents was therefore upheld. en-us Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Apr 2025 08:31:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769188 A belated request for forensic examination of disputed cheque signatures, made after the matter had reached final arguments, was refused because the signature dispute was apparent from the dishonour memo from the outset and the accused had already entered appearance without leading defence evidence. The court treated the application as an attempt to introduce evidence indirectly and to fill gaps in the defence case without satisfactory justification. The rejection of the request for recall of the cheques and related documents was therefore upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769188