https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769190 A complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act was not quashed under Section 482 CrPC because the cheque had been issued by the accused in the name of the concern, the statutory notice was addressed to him in that capacity, and the record did not conclusively show at the threshold that the concern was a partnership firm requiring impleadment as a principal accused. The court treated the cited Supreme Court authority as distinguishable on its facts, since that case involved no issuance of the cheque by the appellant and no proof of control or responsibility. The proceedings were therefore allowed to continue, leaving the accused to establish his defence at trial. en-us Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Apr 2025 08:31:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769190 A complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act was not quashed under Section 482 CrPC because the cheque had been issued by the accused in the name of the concern, the statutory notice was addressed to him in that capacity, and the record did not conclusively show at the threshold that the concern was a partnership firm requiring impleadment as a principal accused. The court treated the cited Supreme Court authority as distinguishable on its facts, since that case involved no issuance of the cheque by the appellant and no proof of control or responsibility. The proceedings were therefore allowed to continue, leaving the accused to establish his defence at trial. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769190