<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1105 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769191</link>
    <description>The HC examined the legality of affidavit swearing procedures, finding the Registry&#039;s practices potentially ultra vires. The Court held that affidavits sworn before Notary Publics should be accepted, the requirement of physical photo identification at the Court centre is improper, and fees charged for affidavit swearing lack legal sanctity. The Court stayed the award and directed further examination of these procedural issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 08:31:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=816266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1105 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769191</link>
      <description>The HC examined the legality of affidavit swearing procedures, finding the Registry&#039;s practices potentially ultra vires. The Court held that affidavits sworn before Notary Publics should be accepted, the requirement of physical photo identification at the Court centre is improper, and fees charged for affidavit swearing lack legal sanctity. The Court stayed the award and directed further examination of these procedural issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>