https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769192 Delhi HC upheld compulsory retirement under Rule 16(3) of All India Services Rules, 1958, finding the officer's integrity compromised due to financial misappropriation and disproportionate assets. The court ruled that second reviews are permissible in exceptional circumstances when additional material emerges post-first review. The retirement order serves public interest by protecting service efficiency and integrity. The Tribunal's decision setting aside the compulsory retirement was overturned as erroneous. Petition allowed. en-us Thu, 17 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Apr 2025 08:31:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769192 Delhi HC upheld compulsory retirement under Rule 16(3) of All India Services Rules, 1958, finding the officer's integrity compromised due to financial misappropriation and disproportionate assets. The court ruled that second reviews are permissible in exceptional circumstances when additional material emerges post-first review. The retirement order serves public interest by protecting service efficiency and integrity. The Tribunal's decision setting aside the compulsory retirement was overturned as erroneous. Petition allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769192