https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769193 A later complaint on firm cheques arising from the same transaction was treated as an abuse of process where the complainant had already elected to present personal guarantee cheques first. The text also states that liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act attaches to the drawer or signatory, so a joint account holder who did not sign the cheques could not be prosecuted merely on that basis. The remaining prosecution was allowed to continue only against the person linked to the signed cheque issue. en-us Thu, 17 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Apr 2025 08:31:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769193 A later complaint on firm cheques arising from the same transaction was treated as an abuse of process where the complainant had already elected to present personal guarantee cheques first. The text also states that liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act attaches to the drawer or signatory, so a joint account holder who did not sign the cheques could not be prosecuted merely on that basis. The remaining prosecution was allowed to continue only against the person linked to the signed cheque issue. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769193