<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1111 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769197</link>
    <description>The SC/HC/Tribunal examined the constitutional validity of Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 regarding CENVAT credit utilization during duty payment defaults. The Tribunal largely ruled in favor of the appellant, invalidating the demand based on unconstitutional rule provisions. However, the liability to pay interest and penalties for delayed returns was upheld, maintaining a balanced approach to revenue compliance while protecting against ultra vires regulatory actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 08:31:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=816260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1111 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769197</link>
      <description>The SC/HC/Tribunal examined the constitutional validity of Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 regarding CENVAT credit utilization during duty payment defaults. The Tribunal largely ruled in favor of the appellant, invalidating the demand based on unconstitutional rule provisions. However, the liability to pay interest and penalties for delayed returns was upheld, maintaining a balanced approach to revenue compliance while protecting against ultra vires regulatory actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>