<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1112 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769198</link>
    <description>CESTAT Allahabad held that restaurant&#039;s &quot;Take Away&quot; and &quot;Pick Up&quot; food services constitute sale transactions rather than service activities. Following precedent from Bikanervala Foods case, the tribunal determined that such activities involve pure sale of food items without service elements, making them exempt from service tax liability. The appeal was allowed, confirming no service tax obligation for takeaway and home delivery food sales.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 08:31:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=816259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1112 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769198</link>
      <description>CESTAT Allahabad held that restaurant&#039;s &quot;Take Away&quot; and &quot;Pick Up&quot; food services constitute sale transactions rather than service activities. Following precedent from Bikanervala Foods case, the tribunal determined that such activities involve pure sale of food items without service elements, making them exempt from service tax liability. The appeal was allowed, confirming no service tax obligation for takeaway and home delivery food sales.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>