<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1129 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769215</link>
    <description>ITAT Kolkata allowed taxpayer&#039;s appeal challenging income tax disallowance. The tribunal ruled that since the assessee did not originally claim exemption under section 54, tax authorities cannot make subsequent disallowances in section 143(1)(a) intimation. The tribunal deleted the addition, finding the disallowance procedurally improper and inadmissible for AY 2019-20.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 08:31:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=816242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1129 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769215</link>
      <description>ITAT Kolkata allowed taxpayer&#039;s appeal challenging income tax disallowance. The tribunal ruled that since the assessee did not originally claim exemption under section 54, tax authorities cannot make subsequent disallowances in section 143(1)(a) intimation. The tribunal deleted the addition, finding the disallowance procedurally improper and inadmissible for AY 2019-20.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>