<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1134 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769220</link>
    <description>The Karnataka HC quashed a reassessment notice issued under section 148A(b) for providing insufficient response time. The notice dated 20.03.2022 granted only 5 days until 25.03.2022 for the petitioner to submit reply, falling short of the mandatory minimum 7-day period prescribed under the statute. Following precedent in Janaki Aenuga case, the court held that the shortened timeframe violated statutory requirements, rendering the notice and all consequential proceedings including assessment orders invalid. The decision favored the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 08:31:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=816237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1134 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769220</link>
      <description>The Karnataka HC quashed a reassessment notice issued under section 148A(b) for providing insufficient response time. The notice dated 20.03.2022 granted only 5 days until 25.03.2022 for the petitioner to submit reply, falling short of the mandatory minimum 7-day period prescribed under the statute. Following precedent in Janaki Aenuga case, the court held that the shortened timeframe violated statutory requirements, rendering the notice and all consequential proceedings including assessment orders invalid. The decision favored the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>