<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1139 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769225</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court noted the complaint that the High Court had proceeded ex parte against the assessee despite alleged lack of service, and that a review petition was already pending. It declined to decide the merits itself and requested the High Court to consider and decide the review petition on its own merits within four weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 14:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=816232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1139 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769225</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court noted the complaint that the High Court had proceeded ex parte against the assessee despite alleged lack of service, and that a review petition was already pending. It declined to decide the merits itself and requested the High Court to consider and decide the review petition on its own merits within four weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>