https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769226 Non-production of documents during audit was the subject matter of the petition, but the petitioner's main grievance concerning paragraphs 1 to 5 of LAR No. 101 had been closed, and that closure was ed in the respondents' affidavit-in-reply dated 28 January 2025. In view of that acceptance, the HC recorded that no purpose would be served by keeping the petition pending and disposed of the petition. en-us Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Jun 2025 14:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769226 Non-production of documents during audit was the subject matter of the petition, but the petitioner's main grievance concerning paragraphs 1 to 5 of LAR No. 101 had been closed, and that closure was ed in the respondents' affidavit-in-reply dated 28 January 2025. In view of that acceptance, the HC recorded that no purpose would be served by keeping the petition pending and disposed of the petition. Case-Laws GST Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769226