<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1141 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769227</link>
    <description>An assessment order under the CGST Act must bear the assessing officer&#039;s signature; an unsigned order was treated as a substantive illegality, not a curable irregularity. The High Court held that the defect is not cured by the provisions on service of documents or mistake in proceedings, so the impugned assessment order could not be sustained. The order was set aside, while the department was left free to issue notice and conduct a fresh assessment in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 14:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=816230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1141 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769227</link>
      <description>An assessment order under the CGST Act must bear the assessing officer&#039;s signature; an unsigned order was treated as a substantive illegality, not a curable irregularity. The High Court held that the defect is not cured by the provisions on service of documents or mistake in proceedings, so the impugned assessment order could not be sustained. The order was set aside, while the department was left free to issue notice and conduct a fresh assessment in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>