<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (8) TMI 90 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYD.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43094</link>
    <description>The writ petition challenging the order for refund of excess excise duty was dismissed. The petitioners were unable to challenge the order after their statutory appeal was dismissed, the refund claim was time-barred, and the petition was considered delayed. The issue of unjust enrichment was not addressed due to these findings. The application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:52:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (8) TMI 90 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYD.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43094</link>
      <description>The writ petition challenging the order for refund of excess excise duty was dismissed. The petitioners were unable to challenge the order after their statutory appeal was dismissed, the refund claim was time-barred, and the petition was considered delayed. The issue of unjust enrichment was not addressed due to these findings. The application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>