<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1148 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769234</link>
    <description>A show cause notice and consequential assessment order under the CGST Act were barred by limitation because, on a combined reading of Section 73(2) and Section 73(10), notice for the 2020-2021 tax period could be issued only up to 28.11.2024. The notice was issued on 30.11.2024, making it time-barred. The Telangana HC followed the reasoning of the Andhra Pradesh HC in the cited decision and held that the impugned assessment order could not be sustained, setting it aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 08:31:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=816223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1148 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769234</link>
      <description>A show cause notice and consequential assessment order under the CGST Act were barred by limitation because, on a combined reading of Section 73(2) and Section 73(10), notice for the 2020-2021 tax period could be issued only up to 28.11.2024. The notice was issued on 30.11.2024, making it time-barred. The Telangana HC followed the reasoning of the Andhra Pradesh HC in the cited decision and held that the impugned assessment order could not be sustained, setting it aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>