https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769251 HC held that the impugned GST orders alleging fraudulent availment of ITC through fake invoices are appealable under Section 107 CGST Act and directed the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. The Appellate Authority was directed to examine the issue of possible duplication of demand appearing in both orders and decide in accordance with law. Considering the prima facie indication of duplication, HC directed that, for the later order dated 10 January 2025, the mandatory pre-deposit shall initially be confined only to the demand relating to one supplier amounting to Rs. 14,12,730/-. The petitioner was granted 30 days to file the appeals. en-us Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Nov 2025 14:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769251 HC held that the impugned GST orders alleging fraudulent availment of ITC through fake invoices are appealable under Section 107 CGST Act and directed the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. The Appellate Authority was directed to examine the issue of possible duplication of demand appearing in both orders and decide in accordance with law. Considering the prima facie indication of duplication, HC directed that, for the later order dated 10 January 2025, the mandatory pre-deposit shall initially be confined only to the demand relating to one supplier amounting to Rs. 14,12,730/-. The petitioner was granted 30 days to file the appeals. Case-Laws GST Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769251