<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1167 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769253</link>
    <description>The HC set aside an ex-parte GST order against the Petitioner, finding the adjudicating authority erroneously claimed no reply was filed. The Court remanded the matter for fresh hearing, directing the authority to provide multiple hearing opportunities and consider the Petitioner&#039;s submissions. The GST rate dispute was left unresolved, with procedural fairness taking precedence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 08:31:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=816204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1167 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769253</link>
      <description>The HC set aside an ex-parte GST order against the Petitioner, finding the adjudicating authority erroneously claimed no reply was filed. The Court remanded the matter for fresh hearing, directing the authority to provide multiple hearing opportunities and consider the Petitioner&#039;s submissions. The GST rate dispute was left unresolved, with procedural fairness taking precedence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>