<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1560 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461676</link>
    <description>ITAT Raipur upheld CIT(Appeals) order quashing reassessment proceedings against assessee company for AY 2012-13. While tribunal found AO had valid reasons to reopen assessment based on information about bogus purchase bills and share capital transactions (not mere change of opinion or suspicion), the reassessment was invalid due to two fatal defects: reopening occurred beyond four years without establishing assessee&#039;s failure to disclose material facts as required under Section 147 first proviso, and AO proceeded with assessment without disposing of assessee&#039;s objections to reopening validity, violating Supreme Court mandate in GKN Driveshafts case. Revenue&#039;s appeal partially allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2025 13:47:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=816152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1560 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461676</link>
      <description>ITAT Raipur upheld CIT(Appeals) order quashing reassessment proceedings against assessee company for AY 2012-13. While tribunal found AO had valid reasons to reopen assessment based on information about bogus purchase bills and share capital transactions (not mere change of opinion or suspicion), the reassessment was invalid due to two fatal defects: reopening occurred beyond four years without establishing assessee&#039;s failure to disclose material facts as required under Section 147 first proviso, and AO proceeded with assessment without disposing of assessee&#039;s objections to reopening validity, violating Supreme Court mandate in GKN Driveshafts case. Revenue&#039;s appeal partially allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>