<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (6) TMI 77 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43083</link>
    <description>Revisional power under Section 36(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act could not be used to unsettle a refund order merely because the Department&#039;s appeal remained pending, where no stay of the underlying High Court judgment had been obtained and no error on the merits of the refund order was shown. The Bombay High Court treated the show cause notice as an unbona fide attempt to frustrate implementation of the judicial order and struck it down, with the challenge succeeding for the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:29:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (6) TMI 77 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43083</link>
      <description>Revisional power under Section 36(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act could not be used to unsettle a refund order merely because the Department&#039;s appeal remained pending, where no stay of the underlying High Court judgment had been obtained and no error on the merits of the refund order was shown. The Bombay High Court treated the show cause notice as an unbona fide attempt to frustrate implementation of the judicial order and struck it down, with the challenge succeeding for the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>