https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461665 A suit for declaration and possession relating to club property was held maintainable against the defendants actually asserting control, and the objection that the society lacked capacity to sue or be sued in its own name failed. The appellants lacked locus to challenge the decree in its entirety because one claimed only a limited portion of the property and the other was merely a club member. The plea of adverse possession failed for want of strict pleading and proof of hostile, continuous and exclusive possession. Ex.A1 was construed as a conditional arrangement for club use with a reversionary clause on cessation of club activities, not an absolute gift, and the property was held liable to revert. en-us Wed, 29 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Apr 2025 11:06:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461665 A suit for declaration and possession relating to club property was held maintainable against the defendants actually asserting control, and the objection that the society lacked capacity to sue or be sued in its own name failed. The appellants lacked locus to challenge the decree in its entirety because one claimed only a limited portion of the property and the other was merely a club member. The plea of adverse possession failed for want of strict pleading and proof of hostile, continuous and exclusive possession. Ex.A1 was construed as a conditional arrangement for club use with a reversionary clause on cessation of club activities, not an absolute gift, and the property was held liable to revert. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461665