<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1061 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769147</link>
    <description>Revisional show-cause notices invoking section 32(1) of the Telangana VAT Act were not liable to be quashed at the threshold because they were tentative and within the revisional authority&#039;s competence. The petitioners could raise objections in reply, including reliance on Supreme Court precedent and State circulars, before the authority itself. Interference at the notice stage is exceptional and is warranted only where the notice is wholly without jurisdiction or otherwise non est. As the notices were neither sketchy nor cryptic and no lack of competence was shown, the writ challenge failed and the petitioners were left to pursue their objections in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 08:41:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=816015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1061 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769147</link>
      <description>Revisional show-cause notices invoking section 32(1) of the Telangana VAT Act were not liable to be quashed at the threshold because they were tentative and within the revisional authority&#039;s competence. The petitioners could raise objections in reply, including reliance on Supreme Court precedent and State circulars, before the authority itself. Interference at the notice stage is exceptional and is warranted only where the notice is wholly without jurisdiction or otherwise non est. As the notices were neither sketchy nor cryptic and no lack of competence was shown, the writ challenge failed and the petitioners were left to pursue their objections in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>