<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1070 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769156</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging rejection of Section 7 application under IBC. The court found that a valid moratorium was in place until September 2023 following completion of the Sapphire transaction, precluding any default or debt becoming due. The appellant-debenture trustee had agreed to restructuring proposal and acted upon it by releasing charges and funds. NCLAT held the Section 7 application was filed with ulterior motives to coerce the corporate debtor into insolvency despite substantial assets, rather than genuine insolvency resolution. The adjudicating authority correctly dismissed the application as no default existed during moratorium period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 08:41:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=816006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1070 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769156</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging rejection of Section 7 application under IBC. The court found that a valid moratorium was in place until September 2023 following completion of the Sapphire transaction, precluding any default or debt becoming due. The appellant-debenture trustee had agreed to restructuring proposal and acted upon it by releasing charges and funds. NCLAT held the Section 7 application was filed with ulterior motives to coerce the corporate debtor into insolvency despite substantial assets, rather than genuine insolvency resolution. The adjudicating authority correctly dismissed the application as no default existed during moratorium period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>