<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1076 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769162</link>
    <description>The HC declared Circular No.36/2010-Cus paragraph 3(a) ultra vires the Customs Act and Constitution, invalidating the three-month time limit for shipping bill conversions. The court set aside the Commissioner&#039;s rejection of 104 shipping bills based on this time bar, directing a fresh merits-based review with mandatory personal hearing. The ruling emphasized that executive circulars cannot impose substantive conditions absent in the parent statute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 08:41:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=816000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1076 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769162</link>
      <description>The HC declared Circular No.36/2010-Cus paragraph 3(a) ultra vires the Customs Act and Constitution, invalidating the three-month time limit for shipping bill conversions. The court set aside the Commissioner&#039;s rejection of 104 shipping bills based on this time bar, directing a fresh merits-based review with mandatory personal hearing. The ruling emphasized that executive circulars cannot impose substantive conditions absent in the parent statute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>