https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769164 ITAT Ahmedabad allowed appellant's appeal against CIT(E)'s rejection of registration under section 80G(5)(iii). CIT(E) denied registration citing composite charitable and religious objects, violating section 80G(5) requirements for purely charitable purposes. ITAT found CIT(E) considered only two objects while ignoring others, and failed to verify whether religious expenditure was within the permitted 5% threshold limit. Matter remanded to CIT(E) for fresh consideration with proper verification of religious expenditure against total income. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes. en-us Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Apr 2025 08:41:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769164 ITAT Ahmedabad allowed appellant's appeal against CIT(E)'s rejection of registration under section 80G(5)(iii). CIT(E) denied registration citing composite charitable and religious objects, violating section 80G(5) requirements for purely charitable purposes. ITAT found CIT(E) considered only two objects while ignoring others, and failed to verify whether religious expenditure was within the permitted 5% threshold limit. Matter remanded to CIT(E) for fresh consideration with proper verification of religious expenditure against total income. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769164