<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1079 - ITAT RANCHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769165</link>
    <description>ITAT Ranchi held that penalty under section 270A was invalid due to defective show cause notice under section 274. The assessee contended that the AO failed to specify whether penalty was for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars. Following precedent in Raj Kumar Agrawal case, the tribunal found the notice defective, set aside the penalty order, and directed the AO to delete the penalty. Appeals allowed in favor of assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 08:41:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=815997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1079 - ITAT RANCHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769165</link>
      <description>ITAT Ranchi held that penalty under section 270A was invalid due to defective show cause notice under section 274. The assessee contended that the AO failed to specify whether penalty was for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars. Following precedent in Raj Kumar Agrawal case, the tribunal found the notice defective, set aside the penalty order, and directed the AO to delete the penalty. Appeals allowed in favor of assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>