<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1092 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769178</link>
    <description>Employee-related education, community development, sports and recreation, and welfare expenses incurred under the wage framework were treated as commercially expedient business outgoings and allowed as revenue expenditure; the additional depreciation claim on machinery used in the mining project was also sustained because the statutory conditions were met. By contrast, overburden removal in open-cast mining was held to be capital expenditure because it was preparatory to accessing the next coal seam after exhaustion of the earlier seam and conferred a capital advantage by enabling further exploitation of the mine. The assessee succeeded on the deduction and depreciation claims, while the Revenue succeeded on the characterisation of overburden removal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 11:05:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=815984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1092 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769178</link>
      <description>Employee-related education, community development, sports and recreation, and welfare expenses incurred under the wage framework were treated as commercially expedient business outgoings and allowed as revenue expenditure; the additional depreciation claim on machinery used in the mining project was also sustained because the statutory conditions were met. By contrast, overburden removal in open-cast mining was held to be capital expenditure because it was preparatory to accessing the next coal seam after exhaustion of the earlier seam and conferred a capital advantage by enabling further exploitation of the mine. The assessee succeeded on the deduction and depreciation claims, while the Revenue succeeded on the characterisation of overburden removal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>