https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=41458 ED moved to declare the person a fugitive under the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act; the respondent argues his UK residence is lawful because the London High Court refused extradition on Article 3 human rights grounds, finding a real risk of extortion and violence in Tihar prison, and that the ED failed to meet the statutory offence-value threshold and relied on inadequate assessment while earlier warrants were discharged. en-us Sun, 20 Apr 2025 15:31:03 +0530 Sun, 20 Apr 2025 15:31:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=41458 ED moved to declare the person a fugitive under the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act; the respondent argues his UK residence is lawful because the London High Court refused extradition on Article 3 human rights grounds, finding a real risk of extortion and violence in Tihar prison, and that the ED failed to meet the statutory offence-value threshold and relied on inadequate assessment while earlier warrants were discharged. News - Sun, 20 Apr 2025 15:31:03 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=41458