https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769105 Delhi HC rejected a suit concerning oppression and mismanagement allegations against executive committee members. The court held that under Section 430 of the Companies Act 2013, civil courts lack jurisdiction over matters within NCLT's domain. The plaint was rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC as the suit was barred by law, without requiring a formal application from defendants. The court emphasized that NCLT has specialized jurisdiction over company affairs and plaintiffs must approach NCLT for remedy. The rejection was made at threshold stage without examining merits. en-us Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Apr 2025 08:32:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769105 Delhi HC rejected a suit concerning oppression and mismanagement allegations against executive committee members. The court held that under Section 430 of the Companies Act 2013, civil courts lack jurisdiction over matters within NCLT's domain. The plaint was rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC as the suit was barred by law, without requiring a formal application from defendants. The court emphasized that NCLT has specialized jurisdiction over company affairs and plaintiffs must approach NCLT for remedy. The rejection was made at threshold stage without examining merits. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769105