<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1049 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769135</link>
    <description>Nominal recovery from employees for canteen facilities was treated as consideration for a taxable supply, so GST applies on the amount recovered even though the facility is subsidised and mandated under the Factories Act, 1948. Input tax credit on the canteen contractor&#039;s GST was denied because the inward supply was taxed as restaurant service at a concessional rate without ITC. Free non-air-conditioned bus transport provided only to employees was treated as an employment-linked perquisite outside taxable supply, so no GST was attracted. Input tax credit on GST charged by the transport service provider was also denied because the transport was regarded as employee consumption and within the credit restriction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 21:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=815750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1049 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769135</link>
      <description>Nominal recovery from employees for canteen facilities was treated as consideration for a taxable supply, so GST applies on the amount recovered even though the facility is subsidised and mandated under the Factories Act, 1948. Input tax credit on the canteen contractor&#039;s GST was denied because the inward supply was taxed as restaurant service at a concessional rate without ITC. Free non-air-conditioned bus transport provided only to employees was treated as an employment-linked perquisite outside taxable supply, so no GST was attracted. Input tax credit on GST charged by the transport service provider was also denied because the transport was regarded as employee consumption and within the credit restriction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>