<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1557 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461638</link>
    <description>Prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 can lie even where a person was not arraigned as an accused in the predicate offence, if the complaint prima facie shows knowing involvement in concealment, possession, acquisition, use, or projection of proceeds of crime. An omission in the ECIR regarding a scheduled offence was treated as curable where the complaint disclosed the predicate offences, and money laundering was treated as a continuing offence. A stay of the predicate proceedings did not erase the scheduled offence or justify quashing under Section 482 CrPC, and the summons was upheld because the allegations and material disclosed a prima facie case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 19:14:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=815726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1557 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461638</link>
      <description>Prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 can lie even where a person was not arraigned as an accused in the predicate offence, if the complaint prima facie shows knowing involvement in concealment, possession, acquisition, use, or projection of proceeds of crime. An omission in the ECIR regarding a scheduled offence was treated as curable where the complaint disclosed the predicate offences, and money laundering was treated as a continuing offence. A stay of the predicate proceedings did not erase the scheduled offence or justify quashing under Section 482 CrPC, and the summons was upheld because the allegations and material disclosed a prima facie case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>