https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461639 Where the amended Section 28 of the Customs Act raised a pending jurisdictional question before the Supreme Court, the Tribunal was required to decide competence independently and not proceed under the stayed decision in Mangli Impex. The Delhi HC partly interfered with the remand and directed the Tribunal to rehear the jurisdictional objection afresh and decide the appeal on merits, including penalty, without being influenced by the unsettled precedent. The matter was thus sent back for independent adjudication on both jurisdiction and merits. en-us Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Apr 2025 19:14:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461639 Where the amended Section 28 of the Customs Act raised a pending jurisdictional question before the Supreme Court, the Tribunal was required to decide competence independently and not proceed under the stayed decision in Mangli Impex. The Delhi HC partly interfered with the remand and directed the Tribunal to rehear the jurisdictional objection afresh and decide the appeal on merits, including penalty, without being influenced by the unsettled precedent. The matter was thus sent back for independent adjudication on both jurisdiction and merits. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461639