<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (7) TMI 86 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43034</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the company&#039;s petition seeking deductions for post-manufacturing expenses, including special packing expenses, carriage forward charges, selling agency commission, interest on credit to customers, and aging expenses. The court ruled that special packing expenses were not eligible for deduction, as they were deemed a normal practice. Carriage forward charges were also denied as transportation costs were included in the sale price. The claim for selling agency commission deduction was conceded, while interest on credit to customers and aging expenses deductions were rejected. The court upheld the previous order, finding no merit in the company&#039;s contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:19:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (7) TMI 86 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43034</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the company&#039;s petition seeking deductions for post-manufacturing expenses, including special packing expenses, carriage forward charges, selling agency commission, interest on credit to customers, and aging expenses. The court ruled that special packing expenses were not eligible for deduction, as they were deemed a normal practice. Carriage forward charges were also denied as transportation costs were included in the sale price. The claim for selling agency commission deduction was conceded, while interest on credit to customers and aging expenses deductions were rejected. The court upheld the previous order, finding no merit in the company&#039;s contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>