<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (6) TMI 71 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43032</link>
    <description>Liability to central excise depends on whether the item is a marketable product known in the market as a separate, distinct and identifiable commodity. An impure, crude intermediate slurry arising in the continuous manufacture of soda ash was not shown to be known as sodium bicarbonate or otherwise marketable, and no contrary evidence established excisability. The product was therefore not liable to excise duty, and no duty demand could be raised in respect of it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:07:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (6) TMI 71 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43032</link>
      <description>Liability to central excise depends on whether the item is a marketable product known in the market as a separate, distinct and identifiable commodity. An impure, crude intermediate slurry arising in the continuous manufacture of soda ash was not shown to be known as sodium bicarbonate or otherwise marketable, and no contrary evidence established excisability. The product was therefore not liable to excise duty, and no duty demand could be raised in respect of it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>