<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>GST Rate Reduction Not Automatically Applicable: Council Recommendation Insufficient Without Formal Notification</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87568</link>
    <description>HC ruled on GST rate applicability for works contract services. The retrospective reduction of GST rate from 18% to 12% recommended by GST Council on 5th August, 2017 was not legally binding until formal notification on 21st September, 2017. The court held that the original GST rate of 18% prescribed in the 8th July, 2017 notification remained valid for tenders submitted before the final notification date. The GST Council&#039;s recommendation alone cannot be construed as a statutory rate change, particularly considering constitutional provisions. Consequently, the petitioner&#039;s claim for retrospective rate reduction was rejected, and the petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 08:38:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 08:38:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=815582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>GST Rate Reduction Not Automatically Applicable: Council Recommendation Insufficient Without Formal Notification</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87568</link>
      <description>HC ruled on GST rate applicability for works contract services. The retrospective reduction of GST rate from 18% to 12% recommended by GST Council on 5th August, 2017 was not legally binding until formal notification on 21st September, 2017. The court held that the original GST rate of 18% prescribed in the 8th July, 2017 notification remained valid for tenders submitted before the final notification date. The GST Council&#039;s recommendation alone cannot be construed as a statutory rate change, particularly considering constitutional provisions. Consequently, the petitioner&#039;s claim for retrospective rate reduction was rejected, and the petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 08:38:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>