<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (7) TMI 84 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43027</link>
    <description>The levy of additional duty of customs under Section 3(1) of the Customs Tariff Act was challenged, but that challenge was found untenable because a binding Supreme Court decision had already upheld additional duty on imported scrap. In light of that authority, the contention that no additional duty could be imposed on the imported goods was rejected, and the petitioners were held not entitled to the relief sought.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:59:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (7) TMI 84 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43027</link>
      <description>The levy of additional duty of customs under Section 3(1) of the Customs Tariff Act was challenged, but that challenge was found untenable because a binding Supreme Court decision had already upheld additional duty on imported scrap. In light of that authority, the contention that no additional duty could be imposed on the imported goods was rejected, and the petitioners were held not entitled to the relief sought.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>