https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87539 HC exercised judicial discretion under Section 311 Cr.PC, rejecting petitioner's attempt to recall witnesses. The court found no substantive grounds for reopening testimony, noting petitioner's repeated failure to cross-examine respondent and abuse of procedural mechanisms. Trial court's previous orders demonstrated significant leniency, granting multiple adjournments. Fundamental principles of judicial discretion mandate cautious and circumspective application of witness recall provisions. Concluding that petitioner's actions would potentially derail judicial proceedings and cause prejudice, the HC dismissed the petition as meritless, affirming the trial court's original order and maintaining procedural integrity. en-us Fri, 18 Apr 2025 08:38:17 +0530 Fri, 18 Apr 2025 08:38:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87539 HC exercised judicial discretion under Section 311 Cr.PC, rejecting petitioner's attempt to recall witnesses. The court found no substantive grounds for reopening testimony, noting petitioner's repeated failure to cross-examine respondent and abuse of procedural mechanisms. Trial court's previous orders demonstrated significant leniency, granting multiple adjournments. Fundamental principles of judicial discretion mandate cautious and circumspective application of witness recall provisions. Concluding that petitioner's actions would potentially derail judicial proceedings and cause prejudice, the HC dismissed the petition as meritless, affirming the trial court's original order and maintaining procedural integrity. Highlights Indian Laws Fri, 18 Apr 2025 08:38:17 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87539